Planning taxonomy and glossary
Planning taxonomy and glossary
Section titled “Planning taxonomy and glossary”Use this glossary for all planning-meta documents.
Canonical terminology
Section titled “Canonical terminology”Authority and governance terms
Section titled “Authority and governance terms”- Authority tier: precedence level of a planning document (
Tier 1,Tier 2,Tier 3). - Normative: rule-defining content that lower tiers must follow.
- Operational (planning): execution-oriented planning instructions consistent with normative rules.
- Implementation execution: code/build/test actions on the product codebase; out-of-scope in doc-only planning mode unless explicitly requested.
- Analytical: critique/reference material that informs planning decisions.
- Supersession: explicit replacement of an older planning artifact by a newer one.
Planning quality terms
Section titled “Planning quality terms”- Anti-foot-gun control: preventive rule that blocks known planning hazards.
- Blocker class: violation type that requires rejection of a planning change.
- Acceptance evidence: objective artifacts required to mark a planning section complete.
- Stop condition: state where planning work must halt and escalate before continuing.
- Deferral: approved temporary postponement with owner/expiry/closure metadata.
Migration architecture terms
Section titled “Migration architecture terms”- Semantic ownership: the single authoritative planning owner for a behavior class.
- Compatibility-only surface: legacy surface allowed only for adaptation, not new semantics.
- Dual-path drift: divergence risk caused by parallel behavioral pathways.
- Fallback visibility: requirement that fallback pathways are observable and constrained.
- Contract integrity: stability and consistency of planned interface assumptions across surfaces.
Milestone and gate terms
Section titled “Milestone and gate terms”- Milestone: named planning checkpoint with explicit completion evidence.
- Gate: pass/fail criterion attached to a milestone or release stage.
- Escalation path: named process and owner route when gate/milestone conditions fail.
- Rollback readiness (planning-level): documented ability to revert rollout assumptions safely.
Detail strategy terms
Section titled “Detail strategy terms”- Weighted depth: proportional detail level based on risk and complexity.
- W1/W2/W3/W4: low/moderate/high/critical planning weight classes.
- Token weighting: assigning more explanation and constraints to higher-risk planning sections.
Historical aliases and mappings
Section titled “Historical aliases and mappings”| Historical term | Canonical term |
|---|---|
| “master roadmap doc” | master planning index + corpus |
| “plan rewrite” | supersession with authority update |
| “execution plan” (in doc-only mode) | operational planning document |
| “safety checklist” | anti-foot-gun control set |
| “deferred TODO” | deferral record with expiry metadata |
Ambiguous terms to avoid
Section titled “Ambiguous terms to avoid”Avoid these without explicit qualifier:
- “ready” -> use “ready by gate
Gxwith evidence classEy” - “done” -> use “accepted against defined acceptance evidence”
- “temporary” -> use “deferral with expiry and closure test”
- “safe” -> use “non-violation of blocker classes + evidence”
- “aligned” -> use “tier-consistent and conflict-free”
Preferred phrasing patterns
Section titled “Preferred phrasing patterns”- “must” for Tier 1 requirements.
- “should” for recommended practices.
- “may” only for explicitly optional behavior with no blocker risk.
Glossary maintenance rules
Section titled “Glossary maintenance rules”- Add a term only if used across at least two planning docs.
- Add mappings when replacing legacy wording.
- Remove deprecated terms only after all corpus docs are updated.
- Update this glossary in the same change as new canonical policy terms.
Acceptance criteria
Section titled “Acceptance criteria”This glossary is complete when:
- all planning-meta documents use canonical terms for core concepts,
- ambiguous aliases are either removed or mapped,
- tier and evidence language is consistent across the corpus.